Latest Updates: local democracy RSS

  • Lee Waters

    A Professor writes...

    Lee 11:35 pm on 16 February, 2010 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , local democracy, ,

    His may not be a name widely known outside the Cardiff Bay bubble, but Mark Drakeford has been a key figure in Welsh Government over the last decade.  On Saturday he’s likely to be selected as the Labour candidate for Cardiff West at the next Assembly elections – succeeding the man he’s been advising. 

    A very thoughtful man, he was the one who effectivley made Rhodri Morgan’s Governments hang together  – ideologically and organisationally.  The Professor of social policy at Cardiff University gave a short lecture to the Labour Grassroots ginger group at the end of January which I have just come across on the web

    It is an interesting read on a number of levels but the point that struck me particularly was his fear that without strong political leadership over how to deal with spending cuts the civil service will lead the way in crudely slashing schemes they were never keen on in the first place.  Or as Prof Drakeford put it “unless we are prepared with our own democratically driven way of dealing with reduced budgets, the machine will take it over”.  

    He warns there will be:

     -       An assault on the entitlement agenda: much despised as low populism, rather than the production of strong social capital which we know it to be;

    -       An assault on jobs: a firm belief that the public sector is bloated here in Wales, with lots of easy opportunities to slim back and make room for the private entrepreneurial spirits which we have held back for so long;

    -       An assault on  public services: those creators of dependency and sullen apathy which save people from the consequences of their own behaviour and teach them that, no matter what havoc they wreak in their own lives, and those of others, the state will always be along to bale them out.

    In particular he foresees a temptation to engage in displacement activity by going after local authorities: “there are voices, at the Assembly, who believe that the solution will be found in an attack on local government in Wales”, he warned.  I half agree with his advocacy of PR for Local Government allied with a new settlement centred on “binding agreement around a small number of key outcomes”.  But can’t help observe that this has been done in Scotland without much effect on the culture of Local Government.  Anyway, that’s an aside.

    Here is a man who intimately knows the way the Assembly Government works, at both a political and official level.  His warning about the ‘machine’ taking over is a sober one.  There are undeniable failings of delivery right across the Government in Wales.  Ministers need to deal with that and not let their officials get away with sloppy work.  But capacity problems pose challenges and there is clearly a fear that when the spending cuts bite and the fog of war descends, the civil service will have the perfect cover to cut the big schemes they never wanted (free bus passes, free prescriptions) rather than deal with the inefficiencies and inadequacies throughout the system.

    So we must rely on “our own democratically driven way” to ensure the response to the cuts is driven by political priorities and not administrative prejudices.  But Mark Drakeford doesn’t seem confident that this will happen…

     
  • Lee Waters

    Is no news good news?

    Lee 12:17 pm on 4 February, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: local democracy,

    As the panel considering the future of ITV news packed up and headed out of town last night, the word on the street was ‘citizen journalism’.

    All three bidders for the £6 Million pilot to provide Welsh news for the third channel promised to democratise news provision by opening up news gathering to the masses.  Who needs professionals when you can have amateurs? 

    Of course it could all go pear shaped as the Tories have promised to unpick any contract signed if they win the General Election.

    But regardless of the outcome an important principle has been recognised.  Wales needs more than the BBC to provide a ‘plurality’ of news coverage, and if the market can’t provide it then the State has a role.

    But clearly it is not just broadcasting that presents a problem.  Less than 1% of the population now read the Western Mail.  The business model of the regional press is imploding across the world.   As the Guardian’s Alan Rusbridger noted in his very interesting Cudlipp lecture “the old models are breaking faster than the new models can be put into place”.

    On Monday Sir Martin Sorrell, one of the biggest buyers of advertising in the world, suggested that governments might have to consider subsidising newspapers such as the Guardian to maintain a diversity of editorial viewpoints if their losses reached a point that would force them to close.

    After all if banks are too important to fail why not newspapers?

    I have little doubt that ‘hyper-local’ news will flourish in the digital age – as Rob Williams discussed in an excellent posting over on Wales Home.  My worry is the all-Wales level.  How can we sustain a democratic tier in the face of a profound information deficit?

    As I’ve argued here before there’s a case for looking at a Welsh equivalent of the Scott Trust – the not for profit foundation that owns the Guardian Media Group. A public interest company underwritten by the taxpayer that could safeguard Welsh news.

     
  • victoria

    No Reorganisation

    victoria 2:12 pm on 28 January, 2010 | 3 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: local democracy

    Today’s Western Mail leader argues that what Wales needs is a ‘rethink’ of local government – hinting strongly at reorganisation. Like a hole in the head! The current 22 authorities are far from ideal but now is NOT the time to reorganise. Reorganisation costs – and always more than expected – with savings if any being medium to long term. Reorganisation takes time and energy, which would be better devoted to developing better ways of delivering services. And anyway there is no perfect solution that matches efficiency with effective local accountability.

    Rather than changes to structures there needs to be a hard look at what works and what doesn’t, what could be done quicker and cheaper, and what people most want.

     
  • Lee Waters

    Cuts, cuts, cuts - in MPs that is

    Lee 12:14 am on 26 January, 2010 | 7 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , local democracy

    There are likely to be few dissenters when David Cameron gets round to cutting the number of MPs if he becomes PM. 

    The Conservative Leader has pledged to cut the size of the House of Commons by 10% as part of his initiative to reduce the cost of Government.  It is of course completely unrelated to the desire to recalibrate the Parliamentary boundaries that currently disadvantage the Tories.

    It is assumed that a 10% cut would reduce the size of the Welsh Parliamentary Party from 40 to 36.  But as Richard Wyn Jones from Cardiff University’s Welsh Governance Centre has pointed out, this may be an incorrect assumption.

    The only clear statement setting out how the change would be implemented comes from Lord Kenneth Baker. The Tory grandee introduced a Bill into the Lords in 2006 proposing that every constituency should be equalised at  76,000 electors – up from around 56,000 in Wales at present.  This is said to be the working model by experts in the field.

    That would mean just 29 Welsh MPs.  And given that the number of Assembly seats is related to the number of MPs it would cut the number of AMs from 60 to 49, throwing the Assembly into chaos.  And causing profound tensions within the main parties as politicians scrabble for seats.

    Little detail has been given by the Conservatives in public about exactly how they will determine the cuts – or indeed how much money it will really save, or the exact implications for devolution.

     
  • felicity

    Clear Murky Water

    felicity 9:32 am on 2 October, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: local democracy,

     Wales is not the open, transparent and accountable nation that our politicians and public servants would have us believe.

    As Siobhan points out, there are too many cosy relationships, and too few who are willing, or feel able, to put their heads above the parapet to challenge the status quo.  Add to this, cutbacks by all the major media outlets and a tighter rein on access to information, and Wales is in dangerous territory.

    Answers to simple questions about how public money is spent and decisions made are becoming harder to come by. Requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act are now standard if you want anything remotely controversial.  The Act was meant to make information more freely available from government and other public bodies, but responses are often downright obstructive, a double annoyance when you know they’re cunningly drafted by officials paid with taxpayers’ money.  

    Putting an FOI request together has become a laborious exercise in sentence crafting – FOI officers are adept at seizing on different interpretations so they can triumphantly deny your claim three weeks later on the grounds of data protection/commercial confidentiality or national security. When it’s more a matter of avoiding an embarrassing revelation, they’ll point you in the direction of a website full of impenetrable data or try charging an exorbitant fee because the document in the filing cabinet is too expensive to locate.

    Getting answers often only comes through asking uncomfortable questions and being persistent. Improvements come about only if there is challenge and debate. If Wales is to grow as a nation then its politicians and public servants need to open themselves up to more scrutiny, and the people who elect them need to have the courage to carry it out.

     
  • Lee Waters

    R.I.P

    Lee 10:06 pm on 24 September, 2009 | 1 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: local democracy,

    The Neath Guardian

    The Port Talbot Guardian

    The Wrexham Chronicle

     
  • victoria

    Wales' second recession

    victoria 3:08 pm on 23 September, 2009 | 6 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , local democracy,

    At the Industrial Communities Alliance’s conference earlier today, Steve Thomas, Chief Exec of WLGA, raised the interesting question of whether Wales could be heading for a second ‘wave’ in the recession.  

    The public sector accounts for 63% of Wales’ GDP, he said.  Cuts in public spending could push the public sector into ‘recession’ just as the private sector emerges from it pulling the whole economy with it.   Add to this the challenge of an ageing population, climate change and waste disposal..There is still he acknowledged lots of ‘fat’ in the system – schools with 2 pupils, a plethora of WAG grants etc, but Steve also recommended public bodies should start  planning for absolutely massive cuts to help them reach innovative solutions. An all-Wales payroll? Mergers of local authorities? Shared services with other bodies? And considerable streamlining of processes. 

    As an aside, this was one of several superb presentations  - more posts on them to follow. But was anyone there from WAG to hear them?  No.

    PS  Heard this morning that Powys LHB and Powys CC are to merge – the first of the mergers. Will more follow?

     
  • victoria

    Government by landlords

    victoria 5:06 pm on 25 August, 2009 | 2 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: local democracy, , UKIP

    I’ve long been an advocate of local democracy, often against a tide of abuse and vitriol against local councillors. But the latest news about Merthyr councillor Adam Brown raises issues that need to be addressed.

    He recently abandoned his position as an Independent to become one of Wales’s two UKIP local councillors, itself raising all those questions about whether it is legitimate to change allegiance after being elected. But the real shocker for me is the revelation that he doesn’t live or work in Merthyr but is able to stand because he owns a house in the borough. This vestige of landlord rule is astounding.

    Are we going to see Ceredigion governed by councillors who live in Birmingham? Or Cardiff governed by students’ parents who have bought houses. High time this ’special favour’ was stamped out.

     
  • Lee Waters

    Would you vote for Tesco?

    Lee 12:18 pm on 11 August, 2009 | 9 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: local democracy, supermarkets

    Am I a hypocrite?

    I shop in Tesco. I’d rather not. I get my meat from the local butcher and veg from an organic box scheme. But a chunk of my salary goes towards Tesco’s £1 Billion annual turnover.

    There are several large supermarkets in my town. The arrival of the last one finally put pay to the local fishmonger. I lamented, but often buy fish from the supermarket. The nearest fishmonger is seven miles away in central Cardiff.

    Though supermarkets promise choice, the impact they have is to reduce choice. Opponents of a new supermarket in Machyneth know this. Local celebrity protestor George Mombiot writes about it in this morning’s Guardian:

    In 1998, the government commissioned a study of the impact of big stores on market towns. It found that when a large supermarket is built on the edge of the centre, other food shops lose between 13 and 50% of their trade. The result is “the closure of some town centre food retailers; increases in vacancy levels; and a general decline in the quality of the environment of the centre”

    But if a supermarket giant is determined to come to town, there’s a limited amount that can be done about it.

    So is it time to overhaul planning laws the rebalance the relationship. Should towns have to hold a referendum before supermarkets are allowed to move in? And would it make a difference?

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel