<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>This is my truth &#187; Liberal Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisismytruth.org/tag/liberal-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisismytruth.org</link>
	<description>...now tell me yours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The credibility gap</title>
		<link>http://www.thisismytruth.org/2010/01/the-credibility-gap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thisismytruth.org/2010/01/the-credibility-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisismytruth.org/?p=698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel sorry for the Liberal Democrats.  Why aren&#8217;t they taken more seriously? 
In the Times this morning Nick Clegg has outlined some very attractive key election pledges:

No income tax to be paid on the first £10,000 you earn
Cutting class sizes and provide more one-to-one tuition to children by introducing a new “pupil premium” in our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel sorry for the Liberal Democrats.  Why aren&#8217;t they taken more seriously? </p>
<p>In the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6975890.ece">Times </a>this morning Nick Clegg has outlined some very attractive key election pledges:</p>
<ul>
<li>No income tax to be paid on the first £10,000 you earn</li>
<li>Cutting class sizes and provide more one-to-one tuition to children by introducing a new “pupil premium” in our schools (he fails to make clear this applies to England only).</li>
<li>Measures to boost the Green economy, including tens of thousands of new jobs in public transport, a national programme of home insulation and new social housing.</li>
<li>Political reform through recall elections, PR, devolution and a ban on tax avoiders standing for Parliament, sitting in the House of Lords or donating to political parties.</li>
</ul>
<p>But as ever Nick Clegg&#8217;s appearance on the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8440502.stm">Today</a> programme was dominated about questions on what he&#8217;d do in a hung Parliament.  I fell into that trap too when I was a political interviewer.  It never takes long to get round to a variation of the &#8216;what&#8217;s the point of voting for you&#8217; question.  It must frustrate the hell out of the Lib Dems, and so it should.  It is pedestrian journalism. </p>
<p>But it reflects an ambivalence amongst the public towards the third party (or does it simply feed it?).  The Party&#8217;s poll numbers have been flat for some time, and the resurgance of the Conservative Party threatens a number of their seats.  After a rough time for both of the two largest parties why haven&#8217;t the Lib Dems done better?</p>
<p>The platform set out by Nick Clegg is an appealing one.  Surely those on the left can rally around that flag? So why the ambivalence?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thisismytruth.org/2010/01/the-credibility-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
