So Gordon Brown will tell the TUC this week that we are “on the road to recovery”.
I think not.
Even if the economy does pick up the impact on public spending over the next ten years is going to be profound. And last time I looked at the figures on the reliance of the Welsh economy on the public sector they left an impression on me that it was kind of important.
The point doesn’t seem to have been lost on the TUC. And clearly Brown is road testing his election strategy by painting the Tories as the slash and burn agents who will put the recovery at risk.
But putting all that aside, let me be parochial for a moment. The impact of the cuts are going to have far reaching consequences for the Assembly Government, and indeed the future of the Assembly.
For all the manoeuvring going on to replace Rhodri Morgan the overriding issue is how the WAG manages the huge reduction in public finances this Autumn and next following the Westminster election. As an old sage reminded me this week, this more than anything else will determine the shape of things post-Rhodri.
As the Holtham report found, the Assembly’s finances are already under strain. Even in times of plenty the Welsh bank account was not getting a fair share from our Treasury masters. But it is about to get a lot worse. “Unmanageable”, according to my friendly sage.
So what could the political fallout be?
How will the new Labour leader navigate the massive cuts, laden down with promissory notes made to Trade Unions others made during the leadership election?
How it will play out within Plaid? Will the coalition survive this Autumn’s budget round? My friendly sage thinks it will survive this autumn’s negotiations but is clear that it “definitely” won’t survive next Autumn’s. It could be a messy divorce. And this in turn raises very interesting questions about the All-Wales Convention and the timing of any referendum. Do we really want to be making the case of moving from Part Three to Part Four of the Government of Wales Act against the backdrop of eye-watering public spending cuts and the lingering smell over MPs expenses? And if not how will the inevitable disappointment be manged within Plaid (in other words can Ieuan Wyn get Adam Price on board)?
The Tories in Wales are already worried about how the new crop of MPs will react to the LCO process, added to that they will have some difficulty navigating between a kind of the “one nation” approach in Wales and what is bound to be a savage attack on public expenditure and services should the Tories win the UK election. Phrases like “now that we have really been able to look at the books the situation…etc”, will help Nick Bourne and his group for a while but it wont cut it for long. All of that points to the Tories in the Assembly having already reached their high water mark for the foreseeable future.
But someone somewhere has to come up with a model of public service delivery in Wales that will be truly responsive to people’s needs, fairer in terms of accessibility and affordable – especially in the next five to ten years. There is little sign of anyone engaging in such thinking.
Owain Jones 9:15 pm on 13 September, 2009 Permalink
You’re dead right. When most councils are preparing for budget cuts of at least 25 per cent, this is bound to be the only issue in Wales for the foreseeable future. It’s also an opportunity for some fresh thinking and radical policies. Will any of the leadership candidates seize this chance? I hope so. Will Plaid continue its process of maturation and get on board with this agenda? We’ll see…
Jeff Jones 1:21 pm on 14 September, 2009 Permalink
Spot on Lee.
Tomorrow Bridgend’s Labour cabinet will receive the budget strategy report for the next 3 years. The cuts in the first year are £7.4 million and this is with a nearly 5 % increase in council tax. In total the cuts in the next 3 years equal £20 million. Although the size of the cuts after next year will obviously depend on who runs the UK government and the Assembly’s reaction to their budget allocation.
Unlike in the 1980s local government faces some really difficult decisions. The mistakes of local government reorganisation in the 1990s are now coming home to roost. Too many of the authorities are too small to have any room for manouevre. Too many have also failed to prepare for what is coming and have often not taken any difficult decisions since 2004 because of good settlements and the misuse in some cases of inherited balances.
To make matters worse the days of the domination by one party has gone. One party domination can be criticised but it did mean that after the blood bath in the group it was easy to get decisions through the council. In a Wales where in so many authorities there is no overall control who is going to vote for cuts? Throw in the failure to deal with equal pay and job evaluation, more money for pensions and increased pressures on social services and we have the makings of a perfect political and economic storm.
It is also clear that the cooperation agenda a la Beecham is running into difficulty. The shared services project in South East Wales which should involve 10 authorities is now down to just 5. Even if it is a success no one expects any real savings until the seventh year of operation.Oh I also forgot about the changes in accountancy rules regarding holiday pay which could add another 3% to council tax.
Owain is right when he argues that whoever succeeds Rhodri will have to start think outside the box. The days of the free this and that are gone forever I’m afraid. It will also be interesting to see how the electorate ( many of whom have played no part in Welsh politics since the establishment of the Assembly) react to all of this.
ap hazard 10:40 pm on 14 September, 2009 Permalink
Jeff’s bleak report reflects the reality in our council, where £5m of cuts this year will just be the start of a long-term funding squeeze. One wonders what councils have done with previous settlements that were in the range of 7-9% annually – squandered on consultants, outsourcing and large-scale projects that overran budgets.
My only concern is that we preserve frontline services to people in need while ensuring that other vital services such as economic development, libraries and sports facilities also get their share. This means hacking at the lazy tendency to hire consultants, external expertise (e.g. in the legal dept) and temporary or agency staff to fill posts at exhorbitant rates. We also need to ask the workforce where savings can be made – they know more than anyone where the waste is.
Is today the day? « This is my truth 9:12 am on 30 September, 2009 Permalink
[...] eight weeks once it is trigerred this is not exactly hot news, and as has been discussed on this blog previously there is great concern on the fifth floor of the Assembly building about the stability [...]